Structural Optimization of Macroporous Magnesium Phosphate Scaffolds and their Cytocompatibility

摘要:

文章预览

Mg-phosphate ceramics have aroused growing interest as bone replacement materials due to their ability to degrade under physiological conditions. To mimic cancelous bone and to promote tissue repair mechanisms a highly macroporous structure with open cells is desired. In this study trimagnesium phosphate (farringtonite, Mg3(PO4)2) and struvite ((NH4)Mg(PO4)·6H2O) scaffolds were developed as open cell foams using the Schwarzwalder-Somers technique and optimized for pore size and mechanical performance. Polyurethane (PU) foam (20-80 ppi) was used as a template. For the optimization of the farringtonite scaffolds, ppi number of the PU foam as well as the technique that was used to remove excess slurry were varied. Sample characterization was done by SEM, XRD and compression testing. For best results were obtained using 60 ppi PU foams leading to a compressive strength of 58 kPa (90 % porosity). Farringtonite scaffolds were modified by either polymer infiltration or transformation into struvite with an ammonium phosphate solution. The pore macrostructure was retained for both of these processes and a reduction of porosity was observed. The microstructure of struvite foams was significantly altered showing larger and more facetted crystals than farringtonite. Mechanical properties substantially improved by transformation into struvite to 730 kPa (68 % porosity). Cytocompatibility was tested using osteoblasts and fibroblasts. Cell number and cell activity (WST) were tested over a period of 3 to 13 days. Farringtonite foams showed a tendency for higher cell numbers than struvite, while the WST activity was similar. Infiltration of farringtonite with PLGA approximately doubled cell number compared to pure farringtonite. In conclusion macroporous Mg-phosphate foams have been successfully produced. Compressive strength of the foams was drastically improved by optimization of pore fineness, transformation to struvite and infiltration with PLGA. The open porous structure was retained and the materials showed good cytocompatibility.

信息:

期刊:

主题:

编辑:

Eyup Sabri Kayali, Gultekin Goller and Ipek Akin

页数:

813-819

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.813

引用:

A. Ewald et al., "Structural Optimization of Macroporous Magnesium Phosphate Scaffolds and their Cytocompatibility", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 493-494, pp. 813-819, 2012

上线时间:

October 2011

输出:

价格:

$35.00

[1] U. Klammert, E. Vorndran, T. Reuther, F.A. Müller, K. Zorn, U. Gbureck, Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med. 21 (2010) 2947–2953.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4148-8

[2] C. Grossardt, A. Ewald, L.M. Grover, J.E. Barralet, U. Gbureck, Passive and active in vitro resorption of calcium and magnesium phosphate cements by osteoclastic cells, Tissue Eng. Part A 6 (2010) 3687-95.

DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0281

[3] R. Krüger, D. Joklitschke, U. Gbureck, A. Ewald, Development and Cytocompatibility Testing of Trimagnesium Phosphate and Struvite Foams, Tissue Eng. Part A 17 (2011) 562.

[4] J. Wei, J. Jia, F. Wu, S. Wei, H. Zhou, H. Zhang, J. -W. Shin, C. Liu, Hierarchically microporous/macroporous scaffold of magnesium–calcium phosphate for bone tissue regeneration, Biomaterials 31 (2010) 1260–1269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.005

[5] E. Vorndran, A. Ewald, F.A. Müller, K. Zornm, A. Kufner, U. Gbureck, Formation and properties of magnesium–ammonium–phosphate hexahydrate biocements in the Ca–Mg–PO4 system. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med. 22 (2011) 429–436.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4220-4

[6] C.E. Holy, M.S. Shoichet and J.E. Davies, Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 (2000), p.376–382.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-g

[7] R.Z. LeGeros, Properties of osteconductive biomaterials: Calcium phosphates. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 395 (2002) 81–98.

[8] S. Dorozhkin, Calcium orthophosphates, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 1061-95.

[9] V. Karageorgiou, D. Kaplan, Porosity of 3d biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 5474-5491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002

[10] A.R. Studart, U.T. Gonzenbach, E. Tervoort, L.J. Gauckler, Processing Routes to Macroporous Ceramics: A Review, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 (2006) 1771–1789.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x

[11] A. Ewald, S.K. Glückermann, R. Thull, U. Gbureck. Antimicrobial titanium/silver PVD coatings on titanium, BioMed. Eng. Online 5 (2006) 22–31.

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-5-22

[12] A. Ewald, K. Helmschrott, G. Knebl, N. Mehrban, L.M. Grover, U. Gbureck, Effect of cold-setting calcium- and magnesium phosphate matrices on protein expression in osteoblastic cells, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl Biomater 96B (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31771

[13] J.E. Barralet, L. Grover, T. Gaunt, A.J. Wright, I.R. Gibson, Preparation of macroporous calcium phosphate cement tissue engineering scaffold, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 3063–3072.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00401-x

[14] L.G. Galea, M. Bohner, J. Lemaître, T. Kohler, R. Müller, Bone substiture: Transforming β-tricalcium phosphate porous scaffolds into monetite, Biomaterials 29 (2008) 3400-3407.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.041

[15] M. Bohner, G.H. van Lenthe, S. Grünenfelder, W. Hirsinger, R. Evison, R. Müller, Synthesis and characterization of porous β-tricalcium phosphate blocks, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 6099-6105.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.026

为了查看相关信息, 需 Login.